Human existence as we know it could disappear and the environment and animals would do just fine; adaptation is a concept that needs to be learned by these socialists. The people of the United States need to be more attentive and respond to attacks on our freedoms and liberties, whether the attack is from an adjacent state on our continent or a state on the other side of the World on another continent. We should be more aware of our responsibilities than our rights in most cases.
We as Americans are separate citizens by state, but we are also united as one under the federal constitution, as such we need to be more vocal about attacks on each state as on the whole. Most of the shows of aggression have been tolerated by our complacency, as a free people, freedom is not to be comforted under the blanket of our own little fraction of the United States. Freedom is an endless endeavor. Most attacks on our nation, The United States, have been mostly brushed off because they come from the Liberal or the morally unimportant states, but beware if it happens in one it happens in all. (Misery loves company) It is interesting to note that a lot of Americans in their own little compartmentalized communities don’t really care until one of these undetected political or material missiles is launched upon them, what the citizens of the United States have to realize is that if it happens to one it happens to all. We are all, each and every one of us, in this together.
Thomas Paine writes of this very thing in his “Rights of Mann”, the first part, which is an answer to Mr Burke’s Attack on the French Revolution (1791-1792). Although the premise was that the dead should not rule the living, Thomas Paine gives this account for each generation’s responsibility.
“It requires but a very small glance of thought to perceive that although laws made in one generation often continue in force through succeeding generations, yet they continue to derive their force from the consent of the living. A law not repealed continues in force, not because it cannot be repealed, but because it is not repealed; and the non-repealing passes for consent.” - Thomas Paine
It is foreseeable then that if a law that is controversial to the morality (which includes honesty, goodness, ethics, and principles) and virtues of this country is passed it can also be canceled by another generation in time. Except, if it becomes accepted as an important law by future generations, then the law has changed the frame of mind of that generation that is yet to come. It has then become the responsibility of the past generations of Americans and our responsibility as the present generation to maintain a perpetual and stable legacy to award our children and newcomers to the United States of America with the same liberties and freedoms that both past and present generations enjoy.
In reality, those that came before us and paved the way, like trailblazers, awarded their Authority to us to, so, in turn, we could mold the next generation to maintain and award the next.
Our Federal government is set up as a Central Hub to the web of state governments that exist; each state is equally connected to this web under the United States Constitution and federal laws. The Constitution, contains the amendments, of which the first 10 are called the bill of rights, one of these rights is the right of states (the 10th amendment),
Amendment X (10)
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people”.
Where the points of attack have been concentrated on, by those that want to damage our country and accordingly our legacy to our future, is through the Constitution itself that is on the federal level, which enables the attackers to bypass the states right and the people; as a consequence makes the state and the people accountable to follow the federal in one action, no matter how sovereign the individual states are, the law becomes the more supreme law in all of the United States, the individual state cannot and has no ability to object. As a result, the law that is passed federally affects all the states, even the complacent ones. In comparison, a law that is passed in California, while California is viewed as a liberal and wacko state by the rest of the country, can and will in effect dictate the laws in a state that may be viewed as a more conservative, like a mid-western or southern state. The contentment by the people of the United States offends me; or is it just the blatant ignorance and lack of knowledge, I can’t decide. The Socialistic ideologists are slowly gaining a foothold in America, after being dormant for so many years. They have done this through semantics and word switching. While making the verbiage sound patriotic its main goal is to subvert the very foundation that has made this country great and a Mecca for all of those in the world that want to live in freedom without oppression. Although; Freedom is won, it is not handed out, people of many nations fight for a better way of life and find that they can do it in the United States because of our fair constitutional laws.
Idealism can never overpower realism. There is a fatal flaw in the liberal and Socialistic view that cannot be refuted. The belief that all things are abstract concepts, of which there may be a particular individual instance…
Not holding to the realistic view that things exist and go on while they are even though they are not being observed. The old adages, “Does a bear crap in the woods?” or, “Does a tree make a sound while falling if there is no one there to hear it?” Of course a bear craps in the woods and all sound is relative to motion. Nevertheless, the liberal might ask, ”How do you know if you weren't there”? The rhetoric gets thick in any debate with a person that embodies idealism as their religion. The fact is, is that life and matter go on whether anybody is there to supervise it or not and this is a hard concept for the liberal to acknowledge.
Idealism n. 1. Forming or pursuing ideals, esp. unrealistically. 2. Representation of things in ideal form. 3. System of thought in which objects are held to be in some way dependent on the mind. – Oxford dictionary – Oxford University Press; Third Edition
The United States of America is falling fast into this trap, the liberal minded Democratic base is flooded with Idealistic vivacious adventurers that constitute abstract thinkers, so spent on greener grass they relegate their wit and intelligence on how it should be: as opposed to dealing with the immediate convention head-on and taking a stand for the betterment of the public in the present and in an objective and straightforward manner. The reality of our social structure is that we are, as people and citizens of the United States, bound together with our government through our legislature and representatives as constituents to those that represent us, governed by the United States Constitution that was established in 1787. The representatives are to support the values and the message of his or her constituency. It can’t get any more simple or non-discriminatory.
The American people are still a remarkable society, through patriotism and social order when given a task to accomplish, their pride and patriotism is second to none. A larger scale of this existed for a little while after the tragedy that was Sept 11, 2001 (9/11) the day that should stand alone forever in the hearts of Americans. It was truly a masterpiece, for a little time, our country became as one through adversity, REALITY HAD HIT! 9/11 woke the liberal daydreamers up and for a little while things went right. Sure the economy swayed and the people stopped traveling for a short period, however socialism and the feel good nomonalistic democrats had no answer for the peace and resolve that united a country that only one year before seemed so divided.
However, as quickly as the tragedy happened the realists dream was over. The politicking, divisiveness, and social partitions that hold our country apart and versus one another that what was going on before 9/11 started right back where it left off. Blame was shifted from one side to the other in the halls of our government. Much of the blame was, of course, on President George W. Bush from the democratic and liberal segment. (How any one could blame a man, who had only held the presidency for a restricted nine months is beyond me.) Therefore, it was supposed that, President George W. Bush was to do in nine months what the earlier Clinton and Gore administration had eight years to do? You have to be kidding me. The liberals saw it fit to drone their philosophies right back into our faces. Always demanding that we need ideas on how to do this and, “how are we ever going to stop the world from crashing in around us”? When it was well known that America was vulnerable to an attack of this scale, by the very nature that makes us a free society. Yet, the liberal representatives never offered up a decent proposal with sound realistic judgment; so as not to help the President, who sits on the other side of their aisle, and avert the potential of the President to become considered a great leader and as a consequence downgrade the Republican Party. All for spite. It’s almost like playing catch with your big brother. You know, when the ball is thrown either at you very hard or so high over your head that it is impossible for you to catch, and your big brother importunes, ”Why didn’t you catch it?”
These two political philosophies, “true” conservative republicans and liberal democrats, or moderates as they like to call themselves these days, differ as much as the living from the dead. Yet are compelled to coexist in a land of freedom and opportunity, because the very nature of a free society is to listen to what another thinks. Not to succumb to their ideals, but to learn how each ideal fits into the larger plan of freedom. I say true because of the semantics that play a great part in how a position is perceived in this day and age of reasonable approved thinking.
In reality many representatives in the government have demonstrated, through time, that they are political vampires that live off the social dead. The social dead being the immovable morally unmotivated and apathetic people of growing resident mass that have infiltrated our American society or what the democrats like to call, their “voter base” that serve their purpose in the liberal democrats system. Like vampires, the democrats hold office in our government to suck the living life out of the souls that they retain as a hostage to become a god in their world whether deprived or prosperous, socialist or Federalist, conservative or liberal.
Parts of the Democratic Party social dead are what I like to call the “FAMILIARS”, resembling the vampire world. Familiars of the liberal politico, are the political wannabees that serve their cause for their masters, the political elite in the democrat party, with the promise that one day, they (the familiars), themselves will be taken to political immortality and ride on the coat tales of the party elite. This idealistic new slave trade has actually become a reality through the promises of lifestyle and “rights” protection given to the diverse voting blocks; though at opposite ends of the spectrum, the voting blocks beat to the same drum, when it comes to political familiarity, to strive for an agenda that delegates that they justify all means to get to the end; an end that is only in their best interests and not, in reality, the best interest of America as a whole. Not knowing that these protections and rights that they are being promised have been already spelled out in our constitution and laws, in order to subvert the wording of the constitution from within, if only people would be taught the true wording of the Documents of the men and women that formed this nation during its establishment. The guise and rail that the democrats bring this train of imperialistic decadence is DEMOCRACY. A word that is so bastardized that the words semantic is untraceable.
John Adams, the second president of the United States, said, “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”
Liberals and their socialistic democrat ilk are nomonalistic vampires: out of sight out of mind is their philosophy. According to Nominalism, all that is required in reality for a general name to be applied is the presence of two objects, each of which is different from the other--otherwise they would be the same object. The only real relationship, which exists between them, is that of difference. Therefore, the only thing that these two different objects will share is the same name. Once a name is put to the object then it can be demonized; or an object that has a name can be assimilated to become the thought or intellect of the party. This can be seen in the human rights argument of abortion. Liberals believe that abortion is such an easy argument for them. Proclaiming that a woman has the right to choose what she wants to do with her body. (Why doesn’t the human that is being formed have a right to choose?) Nominalists conjure up the thought that if it doesn’t have a name it isn’t real and it doesn’t meet their concept of being two objects; Accordingly, the child or “fetus” that is inside the woman that has the “right to choose” is left nameless. This is similar, then, to their denial of the existence of entities and their apparent relationship to attributes in other spheres of our society. Thus, the liberals and wavers of the “right to choose” semantic, do not see the child in the womb as a separate object they will argue that there is no relationship between the child or fetus and the mother or that it is like removing a tumor or a lump of fat likened to the practice of liposuction.
Since the beginning of history how many social services have been created by a liberal secular nomonalistic based form of government? The answer is NONE! We have always relied on the realistic rational social portion of the population to rise to the occasion and build hospitals, Universities, and many other institutions through compassion and civil obedience only to have them bastardized and used against the freedoms of those that built them. A school that was started by a Presbyterian Church can no longer show a nativity scene outside for the public for the reason that it is now a secular institution; because the public uses the facilities to get well.
A hospital that was founded, and still bares the name, of a religious denomination can no longer have a statue of Christ in its foyer because it receives federal money.
Because of the realists’ true view of the world around them, not the narrow ideological view of socialists and liberals, realists seek to truly solve the problem at hand and rouse to the call of duty. Not to disclaim or argue over petty items that fit their own agenda to move people away from openness and directness that would pit one form of society against the other.
Next I will discuss Socialism - What a piece of work the Dems, or should I say progressives, have done.
Thank Me:)
I like your writing very much. Keep up the good work. Slowly our states are being pounded into nationalize one-size-fits-all entities and the 10th amendment has no power without the States ability to influence the Federal government (lost with the advent of the 17th amendment). Also words have no meanings today whether in the Supreme Court or in the Court of Public Opinion only feelings have power today.
ReplyDelete